It’s report that in 2006, the peasant-workers’ monthly salary average anticipated is 1,100 Yuan, more than the university graduates salary which average is only 1,000 Yuan. The argument about ‘the university student was inferior to peasant-workers’ is incessancy.Although it’s two different communities between college students and the peasant-workers, it’s still being connected and become discussing focal point because of ‘salary’.
The peasant-workers usually without enough education, the working they engaged mostly is the high strength physical labor. But many university students cannot find the work, or only has 800 Yuan per month, it’s not the university student is inferior to the peasant-workers, but the working post is different. The university students could get the same salary if they choose the same high strength physical working, even might be higher than the peasant-workers. The college students gets employment relies on the knowledge that is able to have the better development, such as join in the management and so on. So the conclusion of ‘the university student was inferior to peasant-workers’ is unscientific. This unscientific conclusion i* **tremely harmful,  it can cause the people to make the theory of the ‘futility of studying’.
For some reasons, the university student should gets employed relies on the knowledge rather than the high strength physical labor. We needs to change our employment idea, willing to facing the hard employment reality at present, reduces the employment condition and accumulate society experience, willing to build the foundation for development in the future.